The
first journal article I read was researched by Jack Dvorak and Choi Changhe.
They “found statistically higher scores for students who had high school
newspaper or yearbook experience compared with non-journalism students.”
College freshmen with high school journalism experience also scored high grades
in freshmen college English courses than non-journalism students. Students with
journalism experience also scored higher on the ACT, averaging a composite
score 21.58 compared to 21.4 for non-journalism students.
The
second journal article was researched by Lee Becker, Jeong Y. Han, Donna
Wilcox, and Tudor Vlad. The results of their research were nearly identical to
that of Dvorak and Changhe. Becker et al. found that students involved in high
school journalism are more likely to perform better as college freshmen than
their non-journalism peers. According to Becker et al., “Exposure to journalism
at the high school level appears to have a lasting effect on students. The
findings from this analysis add to, and update, the existing research on the
impact of participation in high school journalism extracurricular activities.”
As
I mentioned in my professional journal response, these statistics are important
because, in short, the print newspaper industry is in a death spiral. Print
newspapers, as we all know and (used to) love them, are going away for good.
However, as I argued in the my paper, high school administrators and journalism
advisors simply need to adapt their ways of teaching journalism so that the
focus becomes less on print newspapers (if this hasn’t been done already). The
statistics over the last 30 years are pretty clear – high school journalism
equals better grades in college. I suspect those statistics will still hold
true 30 more years from now, when print newspapers are a thing of the past.
It’s the basic journalism skills, though, that make the difference – not so
much the medium.
No comments:
Post a Comment